STIM1 and ORAI1 mutations leading to tubular aggregate myopathies are sensitive to the Store-operated Ca2+-entry modulators CIC-37 and CIC-39.

Gain-of-function mutations on STIM1 and ORAI1 genes are responsible for an increased store-operated calcium entry, and underlie the characteristic symptoms of three overlapping ultra-rare genetic disorders (i.e tubular aggregate myopathy, Stormorken syndrome, York platelet syndrome) that can be grouped as tubular aggregate myopathies. These mutations lead to a wide spectrum of defects, which usually include muscle weakness and cramps. Negative modulators of store-operated Ca2+-entry targeting wild-type STIM1 and ORAI1 have entered clinical trials for a different array of disorders, including pancreatitis, COVID-19, cancer, and autoimmune disorders and, while efficacy data is awaited, safety data indicates tolerability of this STIM1/ORAI1 mutations are amenable to pharmacological intervention. If this were so, given that there are no approved treatments or clinical trials ongoing for these rare disorders, it could be envisaged that these agents could also rehabilitate tubular aggregate myopathy patients. In the present contribution we characterized the Ca2+-entry patterns induced by eleven STIM1 and three ORAI1 mutations in heterologous systems or in patient-derived cells, i.e. fibroblasts and myotubes, and evaluated the effect of CIC-37 and CIC-39, two novel store-operated calcium entry modulators. Our data show that all STIM1 and ORAI1 gain-of-function mutations tested, with the possible exception of the R304Q STIM1 mutation, are amenable to inhibition, albeit with slightly different sensitivities, paving the way to the development of SOCE modulators in tubular aggregate myopathies.

Mild COVID-19 and Impaired Blood Cell-Endothelial Crosstalk: Considering Long-Term Use of Antithrombotics?

BACKGROUND: Current coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic reveals thrombotic, vascular, and endothelial dysfunctions at peak disease. However, the duration, degree of damage, and appropriate long-term use of antithrombotic strategies are unclear. Most COVID data are yielded from random clinical observations or autopsy of postmortem samples, while precise blood cellular data in survivors are insufficient. METHODS: We analyzed erythrocytes, circulating endothelial cells, and echinocytes by electron microscopy and flow cytometry in patients with confirmed COVID-19 (n = 31) and matched healthy controls (n = 32) on admission and at hospital discharge. RESULTS: All patients experienced mild disease, none required pulmonary support, and all survived. Admission number of circulating endothelial cells was significantly (40-100 times) higher in COVID-19 patients. Cells were massively damaged by multiple fenestrae in membranes with diameter comparable to the size of supercapsid in SARS-CoV-2 (severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2) virus. COVID-19 also provoked formation of stacked aggregated erythrocytes capable of clogging microvascular bed and of diminishing oxygen supply. In some patients, such abnormalities persisted at hospital discharge revealing remaining intracellular penetration of SARS-CoV-2 where it may be replicated and returned to circulation. CONCLUSION: These observational and descriptive data suggest that persistent viral cell injury may cause blood vessel damage; their increased permeability resulted in tissue edema, inflammation, platelet activation, and augmented thrombosis. There is a residual blood cell damage following the acute phase in some COVID-19 survivors. Controlled outcome-driven trials are urgently needed for exploring optimal use of long-term antithrombotics and vascular protection strategies even after mild COVID-19.